When you find yourself more conservative than the Swiss, perhaps it's time to
lighten up.
-- Lorne Elliot
If a guy drinks too much alcohol, he goes out, smashes up his car and gets in a
fight. If a guy smokes too much weed, he rolls over on the couch and falls
asleep.
-- Dave S., A Pot Grower
Ice-cream is exquisite - what a pity it isn't illegal.
-- Voltaire
On 2001 July 31 medical marijuana became legal in Canada.
All you need is your doctor's ok. You must buy from registered growers. In 2002
January it will be decrimalised for recreational use.
Introduction
I used to live in an apartment on Burrard Street in the heart of downtown
Vancouver. Every night at 1 AM the bars would close. People would pour out onto
the streets screaming at the top of their lungs, shouting obscenities. I would
wake up every night to hear some couple screaming across the street back and
forth to each other "Fuck You!"
I would walk down the street the next day to see overturned mailboxes and
vandalised newspaper boxes, the victims of raging drunks. I have seen so many
lives totally destroyed by alcohol. I have seen how alcohol could turn my best
friend from a personable guy into a vicious wife beater. Everyone knows a family
missing a loved one, the victim of a drunk driver.
We tolerate alcohol only because of the failure of prohibition. I ask myself,
what would society be like if the social drug of choice were changed from
alcohol to marijuana. I strongly suspect it would be orders of magnitude more
peaceful.
Marijuana is Harmful
I don't claim marijuana is harmless. Clearly putting all that smoke and tar into
your lungs can't be good for you, especially when the smoke is inhaled so deeply.
A percentage of the population become paranoid or psychotic smoking marijuana.
It tends to make people lazy. It puts people in contact with pushers who can
suck them into trying heroin or cocaine, perhaps by spiking the marijuana.
Marijuana may contain toxic quantities of pesticides or the herbicide paraquat.
However, the deleterious effects pale compared with the much more addictive
tobacco or alcohol. If marijuana were made legal, I think it could make great
inroads into alcohol use as the normal party drug. As a society, we would be
much better off, as would the people taking the drug. It does not make sense to
treat marijuana legally as a more dangerous drug than alcohol.
Reducing the Harmful Effects of Marijuana
Probably the most dangerous feature of marijuana is that it is a gateway drug.
It teaches disrespect for the law. If it were legalised, that role would
disappear. There would be no need for the average teen to have anything to do
with drug pushers at all.
If marijuana were legalised, the drug could be government inspected, and
guaranteed of standard potency, without pesticide residues. With lower cost,
people might start eating it in brownies or other specialty foods rather that
smoking it, which would reduce the health risk considerably.
Instead of all that marijuana money going to criminals to fund their cocaine and
heroin smuggling, it could fatten the tax coffers.
Medical Use Of Marijuana
Nausea is one of the most difficult medical conditions to treat. For most people
with chronic nausea, Gravol does not do much good at all, and ginger does little
better. Stemetil sometimes works, though it puts you to sleep. THC is the only
drug that offers any relief, and probably that is mainly through distraction. In
other words, the disorientation of THC is a necessary side effect. People
prefer smoking marijuana to taking THC tablets because they can precisely
control the dose. With tablets it is far too easy to overdose.
Chronic nausea is so debilitating it leads to suicidal depression. Marijuana
offers a tiny respite of elation to look forward to. This pleasurable side
effect, that so upsets Puritanical Republicans, is necessary for it to function.
Though there is some evidence that marijuana may suppress the immune system, it
can have value for people with AIDS who are suffering from wasting. They have
little energy to eat, they feel nauseous and the strong medications make all
foods taste utterly disgusting. A friend of mine near death on heavy duty AIDS
drugs said that all food tasted like diesel oil. Marijuana can stimulate the
appetite.
Who better than the people with chronic nausea to judge the pros and cons of
using marijuana for nausea? Why allow the blue-nose Republican Senator Orin
Hatch to make that judgement call -- somebody who has never experienced a
terminal illness or chronic nausea.
Reform MPs want to block marijuana for medical use. Perhaps they also would want
to block the use of morphine for pain control simply because it can be abused.
Where is the consistency is this, allowing doctors to prescribe morphine, but
not marijuana? Nobody has ever died of a marijuana overdose. Morphine is
acknowledged to be a highly addictive and dangerous drug. The federal Liberals
are going ahead with trials of medical marijuana. This won't help people
suffering from chronic nausea now, but at least it may prevent future suffering.
Right wing Christians are so convinced of the their righteousness, they are
quite willing to put others through needless suffering by denying them
this anti-nausea drug. I doubt they have even the remotest inkling of the hell
they are forcing others to endure. Nausea from flu for a week is one thing.
Nausea endlessly year after year without a break is quite another.
Why are they so lacking in compassion? Deep in their hearts they wish torment on
those with AIDS, a disease associated with both nausea and homosexuality.
Perhaps someone should tell them their narrow views are also needlessly
tormenting cancer-ridden heterosexuals.
Peter McWilliams, a best-selling author (Life 101 and some others)
is on trial in Los Angeles for using and advocating the use of medical marijuana.
He has AIDS and an AIDS-related cancer, and has been taking marijuana for nausea
so he can keep his medications down.
The trial was held 1999 November 21. The trial judge ruled he could not use a
medical marijuana defense, nor could he mention Proposition 215, marijuana's
medical usefulness, the eight patients who get medical marijuana monthly from
the federal government, or his medical condition. He faces 10 years in prison
and millions of dollars in fines. You can find more information at the PeterTrial
website.
We must stop these mindless Christians from tormenting others.
To those who think they have the right to enforce their marijuana laws on the
rest of this I say this: "Who do you think you are, my
mother? Even my mother would not not presume to tell me what to do. I am 53
years old. I'm old enough to decide for myself whether the benefits of medical
marijuana are worth the risks. How dare you presume to tell me what to do when
you know nothing of the circumstances. You're not the one with the nausea. You
arrogant puppy, thinking you know better how to run my life than I do!"
The Legal State of Medical Marijuana
Medical marijuana is now legal in nine states of the USA. However, federal law
still prohibits it. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the conflict. The
court contains seven Republican appointees and two Democratic. Republicans
generally have an irrational terror of marijuana. However, these are learned men,
and would have to find justification for permitting morphine for the terminally
ill, but not marijuana (which has not even been scientifically shown to be
harmful or addictive). They might handle it by demanding the same ultra strict
standards as for morphine.
Hawaii allows certified patients to possess up to three ounces of marijuana and
grow up to seven plants. Doctors can get a registration certificate for a
patient to use marijuana to ease pain caused by debilitating diseases such as
cancer or AIDS. I trust "pain" includes nausea.
The main legal arguments against medical marijuana are:
It would create an additional source of marijuana to the illicit market. Medical
marijuana would be unadulterated and of known consistent potency, thus
preferable to street marijuana.
Terminally ill people could make money by legally having friends grow some
marijuana in their apartments for them, and selling it rather than consuming it.
It would soften the public attitude to marijuana drug enforcement. If it is good
for very sick people, how could it hurt people who are well?
It would complicate drug enforcement. If ever police found a single marijuana
plant, the defendant could claim it was owned by someone with a medical
marijuana certificate.
Surely common sense has to prevail eventually. What if at some point in history
religious fanatics had banned the tomato? Why would such laws continue to be
upheld indefinitely without any scientific evidence the tomato was actually
harmful with plenty of evidence the fruit had health benefits?
Why Is Marijuana Illegal?
Marijuana was originally made illegal for two rather odd reasons:
To help the Dupont company sell its artificial fibres. Originally marijuana (aka
hemp) was grown for rope and canvas fibres.
As a way of giving the racist police a way to arbitrarily arrest black people
since it was in common use only among blacks. It was a tool of KKK think. To
this day, marijuana laws are selectively enforced against blacks.
We keep it illegal based on myths about the drug's dangers. Utah Republican
Senator Orin Hatch announced on TV to explain why marijuana growers get longer
sentences than rapists was that marijuana was the "biggest killer of
children" What's that man been smoking?
Christians have a fundamental distrust of anything pleasurable. Attorney General
Ashcroft thinks dancing is wicked simply because it is fun. Kristians
think they have a right to make everyone else as miserable as they are. They
imagine they are everyone else's mother with a God given right to tell everyone
else what to do.
Unlike tobacco and alcohol, nobody has ever died from smoking marijuana, other
than as a result of impaired driving. The war against marijuana is very costly,
in terms of drug enforcement and the destruction of lives of the people who
would not be criminals if marijuana were treated realistically. There is no
benefit in continuing the war, and a stupendous benefit in dropping it --
reduction in the use of alcohol.
There are three groups in society that benefit from the current scheme:
the breweries who sell the competing product, alcohol.
the constructors of prisons, and the prison industry generally.
Organised crime who sell marijuana at spectacluar markup. It is as easy to grow
as lettuce, and fetches
per pound or
per kilogram.
Perhaps those are the special interest groups feeding Republican Senator Orin
Hatch his ideas and his funding for his hysterical war on marijuana.
The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly.
Abraham Lincoln
Frontline did a documentary on marijuana. They interviewed law enforcement
officials. The officials said that marijuana should be illegal for three reasons:
It is against the law. [This is circular reasoning.]
It kills people. [There is not even one death attributable to marijuana overdose.]
It is a gateway drug. [This a good reason to legalise the drug. The Dutch
successfully decriminalised marijuana to prevent the young from contacting the
criminal element who would push hard drugs on them.]
We are dealing with professional morons blinded by their religious beliefs.
The Prohibition Experience
What happened when America experimented with the prohibition of alcohol?
Consumption went up.
Organised crime drastically increased its influence.
The government lost all tax revenue from alcohol sales.
Since smuggling higher potency alcohol is easier, people moved from drinking
beer and wine to overproof alcohol.
Health damage increased from improperly manufactured alcoholic beverages.
General respect for law decreased.
Many ordinary people had daily contact with the criminal element.
Enforcement became a major preoccupation of all police departments.
There was no treatment for alcoholism, just punishment.
Criminals actively solicited underage customers.
After giving a good try, Americans decided prohibition did not work.
The Tobacco Experience
Tobacco use is legal but restricted. What has been the experience?
Use is gradually decreasing.
There is relatively little organised crime surrounding its use.
Quality and dose strength are well controlled.
The tobacco industry and tobacco users are being forced to directly pay for
their fair share of the health hazards tobacco use creates.
People who use tobacco are not exposed to the criminal element.
It costs relatively little to enforce the laws that control its use.
People who are addicted can easily get treatment to help them drop the addiction,
without stigma.
The main downside is the tobacco industry openly advertises for new child
customers.
The Netherlands Experience
In the Netherlands, there are "coffee" shops that legally sell pre-rolled
joints for about four Euros. They have glass cases and little cards describing
the potency and characteristics of each type. Yet oddly, the Netherlands has
lower marijuana use and lower drug use generally than either the USA or Canada.
When I visited, I never saw people smoking in the streets, and the "coffee"
shops were not exactly overflowing with customers.
I suspect that the casual smoker never comes in contact with underworld pushers,
and hence is never tempted to try the more dangerous drugs.
Why Is Marijuana Still Illegal?
Given that making marijuana illegal makes about as much sense as making tomatoes
or aspirin illegal, why do we bother? Surely someone must benefit from the way
things are. Who are these people?
drug dealers
If marijuana were legal, they would be out of business. Marijuana would be as
cheap as lettuce, since is so easy to grow, unless of course it were taxed.
racist Republicans
These laws are an excuse to put 1/3 of black males in jail for some period of
their lives. From then on they lose the right to vote.
alcohol sellers
People might drink less and toke more.
prison industry
Less money would be spent on prisons if you did not have to incarcerate tokers.
Puritans
people who object to marijuana on the grounds it pleasurable without any built
in punishment similar to alcohol's hangover.
the Clueless
People who know nothing about marijuana or its effects on people have the
strongest opinions on it. They confuse it with cocaine, PCP, LSD and heroin.
They react with gut terror.
What strange bedfellows!
Hard Drugs
Many argue that surely prohibition is needed for hard drugs, so the same logic
applies to marijuana. Yet strange as it sounds, when Britain instituted a system
of heroin maintenace in the 1960s by prescription, similar to methadone in the
USA, the number of drug addicts plummeted. Drug-related crime disappeared. How
could this be? There was no criminal incentive to hook new users! The drugs were
hard to get since there was no money to be made selling them on the black market.
New users could not get drugs, but addicts could.
This would not quite apply to marijuana because it can easily be grown even if
not available on the black market, but in the same way you would not have
dealers pushing it on new users, especially children.
Summary
The drug war is a sham. Even with billion dollar budgets and by putting more
people in jail than any other country in the world, the USA only manages to
intercept 5% of its drug supply, and confiscates only a minute fraction of the
profits since the drugs themselves are very cheap to produce. The drug war is a
huge expense without much to show for it.
It is naive to imagine social engineers can curtail people from using drugs.
They can't even do it inside a prison where everyone is under surveillance 24
hours a day. How can they possibly do it in a democratic free society? If you do
manage to cut off one drug, users will just turn to ever more damaging ones like
cooking spray, gasoline, Listerine, Sterno, solvents, strychnine ... However, it is
possible for a government to do two things:
Help people work on the painful personal problems that drive them to drugs.
Encourage people who are likely to use drugs to use drugs that will do them less
harm, use them in a safest possible way, and to do less harm to others in the
process of using them.
As recreational drugs go, marijuana is about as benign as you can get. It is not
addictive. It does not cause violence. It creates no hangovers. No one has every
died from an overdose. Dangerously impaired people tend to sit still or fall
asleep. They are less likely to drive while impaired. It would be a very good
thing if any of the people who would normally use hard drugs could be persuaded
to make do with cheap potent marijuana. Similarly, I would far sooner deal with
someone who was abusing marijuana than alcohol. They are far less likely to
seriously harm themselves or others. Marijuana's main danger comes from the
carginogens in the smoke, a problem that could be alleviated with other sorts of
delivery.
It is not a choice of having a population who takes drugs and a drug-free
society. That is a pipe dream. The best we can hope for is a society where drug
use is controlled, and the majority of people avoid the most dangerous drugs.
Dangerous should be defined rationally, not historically. Alcohol and tobacco
are much more dangerous than many of the currently illegal drugs, (which even
include such benign substances as protein supplements).
Only fascist Kristians are under the delusion
they can control everyone else to conform to their puritanical standards. Not
only is that impossible, they ought not to attempt it.
The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of
a civilized community against his will is to prevent harm to others. His own
good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. He cannot
rightfully be compelled to do or to forbear because it will be better for him to
do so, because it will make him happier, because in the opinions of others to do
so would be wise or even right. These are good reasons for remonstrating with
him, or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for
compelling him, or visiting him with any evil in case he do otherwise. To
justify that, the conduct from which it is desired to deter him must be
calculated to produce evil to someone else.
-- John Stuart Mill, On Liberty
Books
Drug Crazy: How We Got Into This Mess and How We Can Get Out
0-415-92647-5
Mike Gray
This is a non-hysterical book that gives a lot of factual information about drugs and explains why things are the way they are, e.g. why crack swept the ghettos while cocaine swept the elite. It explains why it is foolish to exaggerate to youth the dangers of marijuana.
NORML The National Organisation
For the Reform of Marijuana Laws.
Marijuana Seeds:
from Vancouver, BC Canada. Growing your own ensures no adulteration with street
drugs or pesticides. They are not cheap, about
each including shipping worldwide. The selling of seeds in Canada, oddly, is legal.