Is
There a God?
Last updated 2004-06-28 by Roedy
Green ©1999-2004 Canadian Mind Products.
You are here : home : religion
: Is there a god?.
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will
understand why I dismiss yours.
Stephen Roberts
Introduction
There are two related questions I would like to tackle:
-
Is there a God?
-
If so, is He anything like the descriptions in Christian or Islamic scripture?
I suspect the first question may be well beyond man's intelligence to answer,
however, the second is more amenable to reason.
Arguments For The Existence of God
-
The most convincing evidence I have found lies in the fundamental universal
physical constants. If the charge on the electron had been different by an
almost infinitesimally small amount, the universe would never have developed the
structure it did. The expansion and contraction forces of the universe are
almost precisely balanced. You could imagine some intelligence calculating the
various fundamental constants of the universe to find a set that would create an
interesting universe. An alternate explanation is that we just fluked out. There
are/were other worlds with the constants set differently, but they just
generated boring masses of goo, and intelligent life did not develop in them.
Because these worlds would have to be totally isolated from ours, mathematicians
dismiss their existence as irrelevant. Physicist Stephen Hawking said that it
may also turn out, that for some mathematical reason, the charge on the electron
was compelled to be the precise value it was. It was not an arbitrary choice, in
which case invoking God to set it would be unnecessary.
| Ree's Six Universal Constants Essential To Life |
| Symbol |
What it Measures |
Comments |
 |
force that binds atomic nuclei together. |
The difficulties if it were too weak are pretty obvious, but I do not know
how it being a little stronger would have affected the universe. |
 |
binding strength of forces that hold atoms together divided by gravitational
attraction. |
If gravity were not much much weaker than the other forces, only short-lived
miniature universes could exist. |
 |
density of matter in the universe. |
If it were larger, the universe would have collapsed long ago. If it were
smaller, no galaxies and stars could have formed. |
 |
the strength of the cosmic antigravity that controls the expansion of the
universe. |
If it were stronger, no stars could have formed. |
 |
the size of the ripples in the expanding universe. |
If it were smaller, the universe would be a mass of cold gas. If it were
larger, great gobs of matter would have collapsed in to black holes. |
 |
the number of dimensions in our spacial universe, i.e. 3. |
If this were different, our universe would be very different from the one we
are familiar with, but I see no reason it could not support life or something
else equally interesting. This same argument applies in a lesser degree to the
other constants. |
-
The laws of the physical universe are simple, elegant and beautiful. The Spartan
simplicity of quantum mechanics leads inevitably to the periodic table of
elements and from there to chemistry and biology. It can be considered a
masterful piece of mathematics/art. We are used to viewing the universe at a
macroscopic level where it is very untidy. To discover this underlying order
astounds us. We imagine that tidiness could not possibly be an inherent property
of existence, and postulate a designer. I wonder if somewhere there are a race
of microscopic beings, discovering the macroscopic untidiness of the universe
for the first time, and deciding the universe needs a designer to possibly
explain this mysterious chaos, so unlike the natural ordered microscopic
universe they are used to.
-
People have near death experiences. They report meeting the dead and a variety
of religious figures consistent with their religious expectations, and generally
experiencing love and bliss. Surely this is a foretaste of life after death. We
have discovered you can also create these experiences by starving the brain of
oxygen using a centrifuge. Various drugs such as nitrous oxide, cocaine and
heroin also stimulate ecstatic states. These experiences are part of dying, not
of life after death. I have gone under anaesthesia several times. I just
disappeared. I watched myself fade away. I have no problem with the notion that
when I die I have no consciousness at all since I have already experienced total
lack of consciousness while alive. On the planet earth, billions of animals die
every day and billions of tons of vegetable matter dies. What are some
possibilities?
-
Consciousnesses are recycled at the soul level and reincarnate.
-
Consciousness hang around at the soul level for a while before allowing
themselves to be decomposed and recycled in a process analogous to leaves
rotting.
-
Consciousness just stops and disappears.
-
Consciousness is broken down and reused.
-
Consciousness is protected for eternity from further change living happily ever
after in heaven or in hell in eternal torment.
-
Jesus could heal people and Jesus said there was a God. Unfortunately Christian
con artists like Peter Popov and Ernest Angely in our day have convinced people
God healed through them. Does this make their pronouncements infallible? We don't
even know for sure if Jesus was as actual person. There were no written records
about him created until 15 to 30 years after his death. God could easily have
provided more solid evidence for His existence for us to examine in this day,
but for some reason He elected not to.
-
On the 100 Huntley Street TV show, people come on daily and tell a story how "God
told them" to do such and such a thing. It turns out what they meant is
they heard a quiet voice inside that urged them to action. They are so puffed
with pride they imagine their own internal voices are the Creator of the
Universe taking time out to give them special guidance. They ignore 5:37
which claims God does not talk to people. Oddly, not once did one of these
voices reveal the chemical formula for a cure for cancer. Oddly, this same quiet
voice counsels others to murder, such as the demented Abraham.
-
Some people just know in their bones that God exists. They can't imagine life
without that comfort. Obviously, a belief in God is comforting. Your enemies
will eventually be punished, you will eventually be exonerated, your pain will
eventually be replaced with joy and you will be reunited with those you love who
have died. Quite a package! Yet what has comfort to do with truth? The truth
often hurts. People who have been conned often refuse to recognize the signs of
betrayal simply because they want so badly for the con to be true. Wishful
thinking clouds the mind. Just what evidence is there that any of this
Christian mumbo jumbo is true? The only "evidence" is repeated
assertion. Repeated assertion when a child is very young creates rock-like faith
in any arrant nonsense. Just look at the children of cult members. We don't
recognise this as a con even though the believer hands over money and
unquestioning obedience to another in the promise of a reward which, so far as
we can tell, is never delivered.
-
That gut feeling there has to be a God is just a measure of the depth of
your existential pain. Do something practical to reduce that pain:
-
Meditate.
-
Read self help books.
-
Get counselling.
-
Learn how to reduce you addictive load using the Keyes techniques.
-
Start your plan to save the world.
-
Many people, myself included, have had OOBEs Out Of Body Experiences.
This suggests life may be possible without a body. Mind you, every one who has
ever reported an OOBE had a living brain at the time, even if it were so quiet
that it appeared dead. In my experiments with dreaming, I have discovered that
dreams can be equally vivid in detail as real life. Most OOBEs can be considered
like dreams or hallucinations that weave information gleaned from various
sources. My brain is perfectly capable of computing what my eyes would see from
the rafters of a theater, where I was floating in my own OOBE. Yet some OOBEs
glean information by inexplicable means. Buddhist reincarnationist theology is
just as compatible with OOBEs as Christian. Questions on ESP and OOBEs could be
settled either way, quite independent of the truth of Christian theology or the
existence of God.
-
People who are seriously ill sometimes spontaneously recover. Whenever this
happens, God is usually given credit for special intervention. Nobody asks why
God let all the others die with similar diseases many of whom appeared to be
even more deserving. It is a bit like giving God credit when someone wins the
lottery, rather than as the natural outcome of the laws of probability. If the
odds are 1 in 1000 of surviving, there will be natural survivors from time to
time. If there were not, it would be cause for note.
-
People who believe in God have lower blood pressure and they live longer. Some
have argued that man's brain is wired to believe in God -- any God. This may
well be true, but if anything it just shows we humans are so biased we cannot
study the problem objectively. Scientists have even found a God spot in the
brain, that when stimulated creates feelings of religious ecstasy and the
presence of God, using whatever religious symbolism the subject is familiar with.
Bertrand Russell pointed out that the Muggletonians (Flat Earth Society members)
are among the happiest people on earth. Their happiness however, has nothing
whatsoever to do with the accuracy of their beliefs.
-
Jesus said there is a god named Jehovah. Jesus healed people; therefore
everything he says must be true, goes the logic. However, Jesus himself said
that people healed themselves through faith. Ernest Angely heals people on TV by
the power of faith; therefore everything Mr. Angely says must be true. Really?
-
Mohammed said there is but one god and his name is Allah. Mohammed was the
greatest Arabic poet of all time; therefore everything he says must be true,
goes the logic. Shakespear was the greatest English language poet; therefore
everything Shakespear says must be true. Really?
-
The Bible reports various spectacular divine interventions, such as the parting
of the Red Sea, and Lot's wife being turned into a pillar of salt. However, for
some reason God does not act like that anymore. The authorship of these tales is
not established. Further, these stories had long periods of oral transmission,
in which they would be embellished. It sounds to me like they are apocryphal.
-
Monks who fast, pray and meditate for very long hours report states of extreme
bliss, deep peace or profound clarity. Some consider this consciousness of God.
Obviously, something happens that the monk finds astounding.
-
Sondra Ray. Hanging out with this woman is like entering an alternate reality.
-
Ken Keyes.
-
The incredible life of Captain Paul Watson, head of the Sea Shepherd Society,
who scoffs at religions, but who lives a life more charmed than a Star Trek
character. He miraculously escapes from predicament after hopeless predicament.
He hints that perhaps it is the whales warping the probabilities in his favour.
-
Co-incidences. I have had one in a billion coincidences in my life. One possible
explanation is that they are orchestrated by God. I tend to think the
explanation will be more mundane, but still astounding. I suspect we humans have
some way of warping reality that unconsciously creates these mind-blowing co-incidences.
It may be a form of ESP or perhaps some quantum effect.
New agers have recently been making reference to the Quantum Field as a new name
for God.
-
The argument that Wayne Dyer finds most convincing is the explosion in a print
shop. To him looking around at the universe of living things interacting in such
complex ways without conscious design is like expecting an explosion in a print
shop to spell out the works of Shakespear. How could this possibly happen by
pure chance? His is a fallacious argument based on a misunderstanding of the
theory of evolution and natural selection. Natural selection is not pure
chance. Only the mutations are pure chance. Natural selection is intelligent,
not very intelligent, with roughly an IQ of only 1, but when you let it refine
and refine its designs over 4 billions years of winnowing out those that don't
work and keeping on the best, it can come up with some pretty amazing stuff. If
you study the fossil record, it is dithering, inept and meandering, with no hint
of foresight or planning. Scientists use genetic algorithms
to simulate this mindless, but powerful, winnowing process in computers for
solving difficult mathematical problems.
Arguments Against the Existence of God
-
Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe has not been hit by lightning. He is possibly the most
evil man to ever walk the planet.
-
The Norse took Wotan seriously, the Romans worshipped Jupiter and killed those
who failed to show sufficient respect. How is it that every society's ideas of
God but our own are preposterous? What a strange co-incidence! I explored the
Roman ruins an Bath England. In particular, when I saw a bronze mask of Minerva,
I felt an even greater sense of dignity and religious awe than I felt in the
nearby Christian Cathedrals. I was quite convinced these ancient peoples took
these Gods even more seriously than we take the Christian god today. As Robert
Anton Wilson put it, "Nearly 300 years after the Age of Reason was
prematurely announced, most people, in most nations, most of the time, are
mentally in total bondage to religious leader who operate on sheer bluff, i.e.
on the basis of claims that cannot be proven and appear clearly insane to
everybody who hasn't been raised within their frameworks."
-
An A&E special on Scientology asked "Is Scientology a legitimate
religion?" I find the question absurd. No religion is legitimate! All
religions depend on belief in some unsubstantiated silly story. All use that
story to take power over others to convince them to behave a certain way. (Granted,
in many cases this way is more moral than the people would have naturally chosen,
but it is all still based on a lie.) All use that story to convince others to
give money to some special priest class in return for special favour from the
deity. The story is obviously preposterous to everyone but those who belong to
that particular cult/religion. There is no essential difference between a cult
and a religion other than vintage and popularity. We put up with the most
blatant of con games the instant the con men throw in bit of religious hocus
pocus into the mix. The con men may even seriously believe their own malarkey.
That is why they are so convincing.
-
Had Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism, tried to pass off his cock and bull
story today he would be diagnosed with schizophrenia or dismissed as a charlatan.
His followers are considered sane even though they believe the same delusions.
They enjoy this status simply because there are so many of them. All religions
are based on stories just as outlandish. They don't seem so to the believers
because of familiarity.
-
Various scriptures of the world were purportedly written by God. If anyone
should know how the universe is constructed, it should be God. How come then
these scriptures show no understanding of medicine, chemistry or even basic
physics? However, this does not show there is no God, only that God did not
write all the scripture.
-
Some people are astounded at the complexity of the universe and thus insist it
must not have been self creating. They imagine that postulating a God simplifies
things. It just muddies them further. You now have an even more mysterious,
sourceless God plus a complicated universe. An astounding universe by itself is
quite sufficiently amazing to swallow all on its own. It is intellectual
laziness to claim whatever you don't know is unknowable. Hiding the mystery of
the universe behind an unknowable God is like sweeping dirt under the rug that
you are too lazy to deal with. Why is an amazing invisible God more palatable
than an amazing visible/invisible universe? The universe is by definition e v e r y t h i n g,
so surely that should include God -- the creator of the universe (whatever/whoever
that is). So by definition, the universe is self-creating. Q.E.D.
-
Christians often go their whole lives without doubting the childhood stories of
Santa Claus or his older brother Jesus, despite ample empirical evidence that
praying for a pony does not work.
~ Roedy Green
From a practical point of view, what people are really interested in when they
talk about the existence of God, is can He be persuaded to bend the normal rules
of the universe to provide special beneficence for ourselves and special
punishment for our enemies. Despite all the wild claims to the contrary, there
is no statistical evidence that God plays any favourites. He rains on the just
and unjust equally. Christians die in plane crashes the same as anyone else.
Little boys with cancer die whether the congregation prays or not. He pays
absolutely no attention to prayers. Whether you pray or not, both unexpected
good and bad things happen to people. Prayer may give people courage to do what
needs to be done. It may encourage others to help. However, it won't bend God's
ear. That is the Big Lie that churches have repeated so often that most people
believe it. As Gypsy Rose Lee put it "Praying is like a rocking chair --
it'll give you something to do, but it won't get you anywhere." Here
are two exceptions:
-
When an alcoholic prays for deliverance, by submitting to any "higher
power" the prayer sometimes changes him.
-
Quantum Miracles.
(1) may be a special case of (2).
-
Keep in mind that if you pray and a good thing happens, that is not
evidence that God answered your prayer. If you put a cherry pit up your nose and
a good thing happened, that is not evidence putting the cherry pit you
your nose in any way caused the good thing to happen. If you put a cherry
pit up your nose four times a day and nice things continue to happen to you, it
is still no evidence. You must keep track of all the nice and bad things that
happen, and when and when you do not put a cherry pit up your nose, and look for
correlations. Further, you must get hundreds of other people to keep track as
well before you can scientifically claim cherry pits/prayer works. Much as we
would like it to, prayer does not pass this test any better than poking a cherry
pit up your nose. Though we have had thousands of years to accumulate such
evidence, we still don't have anything but anecdotes of the occasional fluke
success.
-
Gautama Buddha observed the first noble truth, all is suffering. Why would a
kind loving god create a universe where all its inhabitants continuously suffer?
Even birth implies old age and decay. Our lives begin in screaming agony.
-
Prayer simply does not work. Consider how many millions of people prayed
desperately for President Kennedy, Lady Diana and Mother Theresa. Nothing out
the ordinary happened at all. If prayer had power, well known public figures
would all live forever in perfect health and happiness. God either has a heart
of stone or simply does not or cannot make exceptions.
-
God is supposedly unchanging, however, He has not done anything to show himself
for two thousand years. He sat on His thumbs through two world wars and
atrocities in Germany, Viet Nam, Uganda, Cambodia and Kosovo. Where did He go?
It makes you wonder if those stories handed down from years past where God
actively intervened in human history were fables, not actual accounts. Sadly,
God must live in the hearts of the people or there can be no Quantum
Miracles.
-
Women who win music awards invariably thank God for their trophies. Similarly
football players give credit to God when their team wins. I find this
blasphemous, as if God were so petty as to take sides in such unimportant
contests.
-
Despite the condemnation of armed conflict in most of the world's scripture,
leaders of armies confidently proclaim that the Almighty has taken their side,
and therefore they cannot lose. Even in the case of Adolph Hitler, God made not
even a token appearance nor made any overt attempt to protect the devout from
the Nazis. If God refuses to ever act, for all practical purposes, He does not
exist. Napolean observed that God always seemed to be on the side of the biggest
army, hardly a ringing endorsement of His moral character.
-
Buddhists and Hindus claim that after death, instead of resting for eternity in
an excruciatingly dull heaven or hell, you reincarnate back on earth. There are
many stories of young children reporting details of their former lives, and
often these check out with reality. The children mysteriously know intimate
details of lives of people who have died. The 14th Dalai
Lama's web page describes the process by which he was selected as the
reincarnation of the previous Dalai Lama. There is no similar evidence to back
up the Christian theology. I have a friend who went to a renaissance town in
Italy and had a very strong feeling of deja vu. He recalled events that occurred
in the town hundreds of years ago, and was able to check some of them out, such
as the location of his favourite pub which was still standing but had been
converted to some other use. Buddhists claim that if you meditate and release
your attachments sufficiently, you will be able to recall details of your
previous lives, just as did the Buddha at his enlightenment under the Bodhi tree.
Christian theology is so constructed no conceivable test could check if it were
true. Usually in science we automatically discard any such untestable theories
as bogus. Only those that could potentially be disproved are considered
potentially legit.
-
The best behaved political/religious leader on the planet is the Dalai Lama. He
makes no claims about the existence of a God. If you are supposed to judge a
tree by its fruit, Christianity does not rank very well. Christians carve
Christians in Ireland. Christians and Muslims kill each other in Indonesia.
Racism and sexism flourish under the banner of Christianity in the USA.
-
The Gödel argument argument probably won't be very
convincing to Christians, but it may alleviate some deep seated doubts in non-believers.
The universe seems so incredibly complex. Surely some intelligence must
have designed it, then created it, argue the theists. Not necessarily. There is
a mathematical theorem called the Gödel incompleteness theorem that very
roughly says a tiny part of a system can't possibly understand the whole.
Analogously, man is such a tiny tiny fraction of the universe that it is
preposterous to imagine his relatively nanoscopic brain could glimpse but even a
inkling of the totality or the inate intelligence of the totality. So naturally
the universe seems incredible and miraculous to him. The universe
necessarily appears that way because we humans are such a tiny tiny part of it.
It appears that way because we compare the entire universe with our own
mundane little limited existences. We don't have an absolute yardstick for how
wonderful our universe is. We have only have one to admire. If there are
parallel universes, perhaps ours may turn out to be comparatively shabby,
obviously lacking the ultra-intelligent design of the usual universe, (where all
the women are beautiful, all the men are strong and all the children are above
average) proving a true God had nothing to do with ours.
-
People tell me they could not bare it if there were no God. I think this is
rubbish. If there is a God, he is clearly a rather cruel or uncaring or
ineffective bastard. There is not much hope. God made things the way they are.
He must want them that way despite his protestations. How can things
change with a great lunk like that in charge? There is no hope. So it is less
pessistic to assume their is no one in charge. It means things could get better.
You are merely fighting chaos, not a deity, to improve man's lot.
Holy Blackmail
Several people have tried to persuade me to become Christian with a pragmatic
argument that goes like this:
Let's assume that it is very unlikely that God exists, say 1%. You should still
believe in Him anyway and follow Christian dogma for purely practical reasons.
There are four cases:
-
If you believe in Him and He does not exist, what do you lose? You just die and
nothing happens.
-
If you believe in Him and He does exist, you have eternity in Heaven.
-
If you don't believe in Him and He does not exist, you just die and nothing
happens.
-
If you don't believe in Him and He does exist, you will rot in Hell for eternity.
You come out ahead if you believe, in two of the four cases.
I counter this argument by saying:
-
I am interested in the truth, not toadying to some imaginary despot. This
argument is roughly the moral equivalent of a scientist falsifying his findings
in hopes of receiving a bribe from a tobacco company. It is intellectual
dishonesty. Poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834) in his Aids To Reflection
put it this way; "He who begins by loving Christianity better than truth,
will proceed by loving his own sect or church better than Christianity, and end
in loving himself better than all."
-
If this argument persuades you, then you should become a Muslim. Islam offers
far greater after death rewards to the faithful and far more terrifying tortures
for the non-believer than Christianity does. Jehovah is a wimp compared with
Allah. Read the Qur'an if you are skeptical. I did and had nightmares for months.
-
The Greek philosopher Epicurus (circa. 341-270 BC) put it this matter-of-fact
way: "Why should I fear death? If I am, death is not. If death is, I am
not. Why should I fear that which cannot exist when I do?"
-
Every religion offers these punishments and rewards to its rejectors and
adherents, including the worship of Wotan and Zeus and the religions of the
Indians of the Amazon. How do you decide which is the true religion? They all
sound equally improbable, bogus and silly.
-
If you follow the tenets of Christianity as it is practiced you would
probably lead a more evil life than you would otherwise. You would be
judgemental. You would discriminate against gays and probably blacks. You would
lie to people about the best ways to cure disease. You would spread superstition
and lies that are part of the Christian faith. You would indirectly kill
children by blocking sex education about AIDS and birth control.For
a more detailed list of the evils of Christianity, see the essay
2004-06-28 on why
Christianity should be combatted. As an extreme example, Jeff Dahmer
said grace before consuming his murder victims.
-
If you believe in God, you life will actually be more miserable than if you do
not. Why? If you believe in God, you will tend to mope around praying --
wondering why God is ignoring you. You will waste time waiting for God to do
things only you can do for yourself. If you don't believe in God, you will be
much more practical and self reliant. You won't be saddled with an unrealistic
sense of entitlement. You cannot very well be angry with God for disappointing
you if you don't believe in Him.
Preferences
People often tell me that they just could not stand to be alive if there were no
God. Roughly, if there were no God, they would invent one. All they are doing is
warning me about their emotional biases. They know they can't look on the matter
objectively.
In Isaiah 45:7 God admits he creates the evil
in the world. God then gave your father a brain tumor, fanned the hatred that
boiled over into a gang rape of an eight year old Albanian girl, etc. If this is
true, you are dealing with an immensely powerful, evil, cruel, heartless,
arbitrary adversary. What hope do you have? In the story of Job, it is clear God
does not even spare the just from his sadistic torments.
Would you not prefer to deal instead with nature? These negative happenings are
essentially random events, but with some pattern behind them. There are laws
physical or psychological. Eventually they may be understood and the evils
averted. I certainly would prefer to deal with nature than a quixotic, slippery,
tyrant God.
What Is God Like?
There are two quite different pictures you get of God, one from examining the
Bible and the Qur'an, and quite a different one from examining the rest of the
universe as well.
Beware the man of one book.
-- St. Thomas Aquinas
The God of scripture is petty, cruel, jealous, inconsistent, prudish, partisan
and foolish. He is fanatically concerned with controlling every thought and
action of humans with a set of insanely arbitrary rules. He desperately wants to
be loved. He is willing to bribe his subjects with unimaginable largess or
torment after death, but refuses to offer even the tiniest foretaste to prove he
is not bluffing. Earth and man are the center of His existence. He is oddly
partial to the Jewish people at the expense of all others.
To me, that description sounds like a Roman Caesar -- how a human behaves when
given absolute power. The Old Testament was composed by people imagining
what they thought God would say if He spoke. Unfortunately, they projected their
failings onto Him. They described how they would behave if given absolute
power. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
does not apply to God, only to people.
In contrast,look at the universe. See the stupendous variety and stupendous
quantity. Earth is just a tiny backwater planet on the edge of a backwater
galaxy. There are trillions of stars and trillions of planets. Even on earth,
the variety of animal and plant life is utterly amazing.
No prude created the sexually-daisy-chaining periwinkle. As Blake put it, "The
lust of the goat is the glory of God".
If there is a creator, He is the consumate mathematician, physicist and
biologist. He is not some narrow cleric afraid to look at the earth as it is.
The world is full of beauty and cruelty. Birds and fish are dazzling colours and
patterns for no apparent reason other than exuberant beauty. The whole web of
life is built on the principle that animals eat plants and kill and eat each
other. This is the fundamental cruelty of our existence. A frog may have a
million young, yet only two on average will survive to adulthood. This is true
of all species, including humans. Does that seriously sound like the handiwork
of an infinitely merciful deity?
God likes using small simple building blocks to construct a bewildering variety
of forms. Consider atoms, DNA and cells, in particular brain cells.
If there is a God, He looks after the big picture. He has no more interest in
individual humans than a child would have in the individual ants in his ant farm.
He works with general principles and allows their consequences to work out
logically.
God likes subtle asymmetry.
The bewildering intricate beauty of the Mandelbrot set springs forth from the
simplest of mathematical equations. Even these lowly equations can help
themselves from strutting like peacocks.
Life After Death
Life after death is a related question to is there a God? You might have it four
ways:
-
No god. no afterlife, (materialist)
-
No god, with afterlife (Buddhist)
-
God, no afterlife (hippy)
-
God, with afterlife (Christian, Muslim)
Pro
-
Almost every culture has some sort of life-after-death myth. The details of what
actually happens vary considerably. There is usually some form of adjudication
of how well you did in your life, and some form of punishment or reward. If the
myth is so common, maybe there is something to it other than just wishful
thinking.
-
People who die on the operating table and are later revived report very similar
stories about traveling down a tunnel toward a bright light, often meeting dead
relatives, and often meeting some loving religious figure. These experiences can
also be induced using a centrifuge to reduce the flow of blood to the brain.
This may well just be the standard hallucination the brain kicks into when blood
flow is reduced. It explains the origin of the belief in life after death. The
extreme euphoria is caused by an excess of nitrous oxide, (a natural brain
transmitter) in the brain. Yet people don't just dream of tunnels, they dream
specifically of death. If the after death experience is in some other dimension,
people will inevitably map this unfamiliar experience back onto their ordinary
world with its expectations, created by religious conditioning. If the cause
were simply an oxygen-starved brain, I would expect much greater variety in the
hallucinations. It also seems odd that people rarely have ordinary dreams of
after-death experiences. In near death experiences, people often report rapidly
reviewing their whole life, only with the ability to sense the emotions of
others around them. It seems strange man would evolve to reserve this very
useful review only for the last minutes of life.
-
People have hellish near death experiences. People are typically reluctant to
talk about them. I had an operation requiring general anaesthesia to remove an
impacted wisdom tooth. I partially woke up in the middle of the operation.
Several people had to be called in to restrain me and put me back under. From my
point of view, I was in hell, falling endlessly through a gray fog in
excruciating pain. I assumed I was dead and this was indeed hell. The experience
was much more vivid than a dream. Ironically, fundamentalists (who in theory
should have the least to fear from hellfire) have these experiences much more
frequently than other people. Most people have entirely positive near death
experiences. In the middle ages people typically reported a negative experience
that transformed into a positive one.
-
In Buddhist countries children reportedly remember their previous lives and the
people in them. I don't know the care to which the children are shielded from
hearing stories of their supposed previous lives, or just how accurate the
descriptions the children provide actually are. I saw one documentary where a
child simply reached out to play with various objects belonging to a dead person,
and the onlookers read a great deal into this.
-
Anecdotal ghost stories. If even one ghost story is true, that would be evidence
for some sort of existence after death.
-
I have had an out of body experience, as have many other people. It appears your
consciousness is floating outside your body able to look down on it. This sounds
very similar to what is supposed to happen to you after death. However, with an
OOBE your brain is still functioning, so perhaps it is a hallucination where you
project what the world would look like from up on the ceiling.
-
Australian aborigines have a form of consciousness they call "dream time".
From the little I can find out about it, it appears to be as different from
ordinary consciousness as death.
-
One day I was sitting under a tree at the University Of BC. A group of Hare
Krishna devotees were chanting nearby. A little girl from the group walked over
and gave me a small bag of nuts. I experienced the event in a miraculous way. It
was as if I were everything at once, not just confined to my limited body.
Perhaps it is just an illusion that I am Roedy Green. In actuality I may be the
whole ball of wax. As such, it seems unlikely I would disappear when Roedy Green's
body dies.
-
In a very mundane sense, there is only one being living on planet earth.
Consider the amoeba. They reproduce by splitting in two. If you look at any
amoeba today it is billions of years old. You might in theory trace all the
amoebae alive in the world today to a single ancestor. Thus in one sense there
is only one amoeba, living in many bodies. If an amoeba dies, has the
amoeba died? no. It is much like single blood cell in a human dying. If you
follow back further you would probably find that other one celled animals all
share a common ancestor with the amoeba too. There is only one "life"
living in many bodies. Multicelled humans too are part of this single life tree.
Our cells too grow only by splitting, but in more specialised ways, going
through a minimalist stage periodically as sperm and egg cells. However, each of
a human's cells is similarly billions of years old, with an unbroken chain of
cell divisions going all the way back through the generations of humanity. Oddly,
even though the cells are billions of years old, the cells die within 100 years
of birth, if they stay part of human's body i.e. if they don't leave it as sperm
or as a completed baby. They have a built-in death count-down mechanism called
telomeres. If there is only one life, living in many bodies in many forms, you,
the primordial life, lives on even if your little human body dies.
Con
-
If a person sustains brain damage, his mental capacities are correspondingly
impaired. If the mind were separate from the brain, it should remain undamaged.
Similarly for the effects of diseases such as Alzheimer and schizophrenia. It
thus appears if a brain is totally damaged, so is the corresponding mind. Thus
it appears a mind (consciousness) dies when the corresponding brain dies. There
is now evidence that consciousness is brain
activity. You are only conscious of something once a certain threshold of
neurons start firing.
-
I have experienced anaesthesia several times in my life. I felt myself totally
disappear. I awoke with the sensation no time had passed. It appeared my
consciousness did not exist for the duration of the operation. Consciousness
does not thus have to go somewhere when you die. It can just stop.
-
Nobody can give reasonable explanation for how anyone would know if the after-death
myth of their culture could be true. Usually some shaman figure (e.g. Buddha,
Jesus, Mohammad) simply announces it is, and people take his word for it based
on his reputation as a moral figure. He just knows by some mysterious process
not available to ordinary humans.
-
The after-death myths are very man-centred. I have a rough time imagining a God
that did not value dolphins, whales and many other species as equally important
to man.
-
When the Spanish came to America, the indigenous peoples mistook them for Gods.
If beings from other parts of the galaxy ever send their technology to earth,
surely the technology gap would be even greater. We would mistake it for magic
or acts of God. The universe is an unimaginably huge place. We have just begun
to explore just one tiny solar system. If life could happen once, surely it
would happen over and over. It is mind boggling to contemplate the possibility
that there is other intelligent life in the cosmos, but even more mind boggling
to contemplate the possibility there is not, and we are utterly alone and
utterly unique.
Omnipotence
Christian theologians have made some rather silly assumptions about the creator
of the universe, namely that He is omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, perfect,
infinitely loving, infinitely good. There is no reason on earth the creator of
the universe necessarily would necessarily have any of those qualities. It is
almost like a son bragging about his Dad.
Clearly toothaches, bad breath and fungus infections exist. How to explain that?
We presume that God created a Devil who then created these things. God gets off
the hook by one level of indirection. That makes about as much sense as a Mafia
don claiming innocence because he hired a hitman.
Perhaps it would be simpler to just say God created the best universe he could
at the time. Perhaps it is impossible to create a logically consistent
universe any better than this. This may be the best of all possible
worlds.
We keep imagining the universe was created for the personal pleasure of man. We
may well prove to be one of the least important species in the galaxy. From God's
point of view, we may well be a cancer on planet earth, destroying its carefully
planned biological diversity, about as well-loved as rose blight.
The one thing we have discovered is the creation is logically consistent.
Scripture is anything but. If there is a creator, the best way to understand Him
is to study His creation.
Finally have a read of what some of the history's most famous thinkers had to
say on the subject in this list
of quotations.
Advantages of Believing in God
None of these argument have any bearing on whether God actually exists, they are
the pragmatic advantages for believing.
-
You can console yourself when a loved one dies with the thought you will see
them again.
-
If it turns out my some fluke you picked the one true religion (if there indeed
is one), and the one true sect within that religion, this gives you brownie
points rewarding you in the afterlife for your acuity. You go to the head of the
heavenly chow line. Lot's of luck picking the right one from this list.
-
It can give you hope in a hopeless situation, such as a fatal illness. God might
set aside the usual rules of the universe or arrange some co-incidences to
rescue you.
-
It can give you fellowship.
-
It can help you feel superior to others.
-
It can erase doubt and let you stop thinking. You can relax. Others will spoon
feed you all the answers to life's problems. The answers might not make any
sense, but you know they must be valid since they came direct from God.
-
If you are addicted to drugs, it may help you become unaddicted.
-
If you tend to spend much of your time worrying, it can train you to take your
mind off your troubles and think more optimistically. Emmet Fox suggests that
casting your troubles on God, then contemplating the nature of God instead will
change your consciousness, and hence your reality will improve. This technique
could work whether or not God actually exists.
-
It gives you extra motivation to treat others well and to avoid criminal
activity.
-
It can let you fearlessly tackle dangerous activities. The worst that can happen
is you will end up in heaven early.
Disadvantages of Believing in God
None of these argument have any bearing on whether God actually exists, they are
the pragmatic disadvantages of believing.
-
You tend to sit twiddling your thumbs praying rather than doing something useful
about a problem.
-
You fall in the ditch or run out of money because you expect God to look out for
you.
-
You look like an idiot with your rigid illogical opinions to those studying how
nature actually works.
-
Other people will avoid you socially because of your utterly predictable endless
babblings about God.
-
You have to worry about eternal punishment. The Bible and Qu'ran imply only a
tiny fraction of people make the grade.
-
It makes you an intolerant pain in the ass since you are under the delusion you
are in exclusive possession of the word of God on every matter.
-
You may kill your children (by refusing medical attention), ignore facts right
under your nose, and justify all manner of wickedness (such as tormenting
homosexuals) using your holy book for justification.
-
Because your Bible is purportedly the word of God, you don't worry if the advice
it gives is inconsistent, illogical or wicked.
-
You must play lawyer to defend your holy books which were written by men
thousands of years ago. Of course they are not consistent with what we know now.
You have to disingenuously twist words to pretend they do.
-
You can't use compassion and logic to determine you ethical choices. You must
use rigid rules composed thousands of years ago when women were treated as
slaves, it was considered proper to own slaves, and people believed disease was
caused by unclean spirits.
How To Find God
Evangelist Emmet Fox in his book Around the Year with Emmet Fox: A Book of
Daily Readings, proposes an experiment. Here is a greatly abbreviated
description of it.
 | Around The Year With Emmet Fox |
| 0-06-250408-8 |
| Emmet Fox |
|
|
|
-
Forgive everyone including yourself.
-
For a period of a month, every time you have a trouble, no matter how
personal, embarrassing, unholy or trifling, instead of worrying about it, give
the problem to God to deal with. Then spend the time you would have spent
worrying contemplating God, e.g. unbounded power, unbounded intelligence,
unbounded love, unbounded wisdom, perfect humour, omnipresence (Don't you think
it a bit rude of humanity to create garbage dumps, which God because of his
omnipresence must inhabit.), joy, truth, spirit, principle etc. You are
on a fast from negative thoughts.
-
Here is the hard part. Have faith that God will actually take care of all these
problems in a much more intelligent and pleasing way than you could ever come up
with yourself. If you don't have faith, you are at least supposed to act as if
you did. This should suffice.
-
Don't dictate to God how to solve the problem. God may come up with some
very indirect solution that you may not even recognise as a solution.
-
Don't look for results. They may come at the 13th hour.
-
Don't tell anyone during the month about your experiment. You can talk about it
afterward.
-
If it does not work, according to Fox, chances are you failed to be 100%
unconditionally loving to everyone. Since no one can attain that perfection,
there is always an excuse why this won't work. It requires God's reputed mercy
to have any hope of working.
You can then interpret anything out of the usual that happens either as co-incidence,
the work of God or as the work of your unconscious, and decide for yourself
which seems most plausible.
To me it would seem prudent to act normally during your experiment. Pay your
bills. Look both ways before crossing the street. You don't want to get yourself
in too much trouble if God decides to ignore you for not having enough faith. On
the other hand, you want to go at it seriously. After a failure, you will have
even more evidence that God will ignore your pleas, and so it will be even
harder to whip up the requisite faith for a second attempt.
I'd be interested in hearing from people who have performed this experiment.
Tell me what happened and how you interpreted it.
I tried the experiment for the month of 2000 June. I spent three weeks taking
ganciclovir IVs to clear up my nausea where nearly everything went wrong. At
first, it looked like the treatment did not work. I met a strikingly handsome
young guy who came over twice for massages. I worried less than usual, and it
became clear that worry does little to improve most situations. There was
nothing sufficiently out of the ordinary to require divine explanation. However,
the following month something unusual did happen. A long standing friend asked
if she could become my lover, and I accepted, even though she was of the "wrong
" sex. Life has been unusually pleasant and eventful ever since.
How Can You Tell When You Have Found God?
I once heard the voice of God. It said "Vrrrrmmmmm." Unless it was
just a lawn mower.
-- Age 11
Nearly everyone claims to have found God when they feel something inside
intensely pleasant and very different from anything they have felt before. There
are three problems relying totally on this approach.
-
When my friend Phil was a child he shinnied up a pole and had an orgasm. He
assumed the pleasant sensations were caused by being "closer to God"
near the top of the pole. We laugh at Phil, but grown people act just as
foolishly.
-
These intense feelings can be created on cue. Preachers have been perfecting the
techniques for centuries. In modern days there is a whole new arsenal of ways of
fooling people into thinking they have truly found God. See Dick
Sutphen's article on how it is done.
-
People who rely on pleasant sensations for their spiritual barometer can find
themselves bound to the gods of cocaine or heroin.
I think more reliable signs would be how you had changed for the better or how
your life had turned around. These effects may take years to become apparent.
Other people would probably tell you they thought your life was touched by God.
Alternate Definitions of God
-
God as cosmic body guard: God protects you from
harm and disease. Actually the top banana is not really necessay, a guardian
angel or a friendly alien would suffice.
-
God as cosmic Santa Claus: God is that which
answers prayers. You can petition God to grant you exciting sexual partners,
good health, material goods, and the esteem of your fellow man, all without
effort. He could be considered as a sort of Star Trek replicator.
-
God as sadistic Master: God gives you cancer or
makes you lose your lover to teach you some mysterious spiritual lesson
so you will grow. The curriculum is never explained.
-
God as cosmic snake oil: God is good for whatever
ails you. God is the solution to every problem. Just join my religion and you
can have all the God you want, for a small monthly fee.
-
God as cosmic teddy bear: God is a companion with
you all the time. He says nothing, but he is a Good Listener.
-
God as cosmic hit man: If anyone ever does you
wrong, you can rest assured God will torment him for eternity in the afterlife.
Unfortuately, we all have done somebody wrong, so we will all have to
console ourselves as we are tortured knowing everyone else is being tormented
too.
-
I am God: This is not quite a whacko as is first
sounds. Usually people mean by this there is some common spirit or consciousness
that inhabits all humans that we experience as the sense of I amness.
-
God as ideal lover: God looks absolutely fabulous,
and for some reason he thinks you too look absolutely fabulous, even if you are
overweight with bad breath.
-
God as cosmic tripper: God sees everything as
perfect. Even suffering is beautiful. Even a dead fish in a polluted river has a
deep mysterious perfection. Even Microsoft Windows is perfect. God is completely
out of touch with how the rest of us experience reality.
-
God is Love: This definition has Biblical support. 1
John 4:8 He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is
love.
-
God as the creator of the universe: Even atheists
can believe in God with this sort of definition.
-
God as the thing you most fear that won't hurt you:
That puts extra meaning into the no other gods before me clause.
Pascal's Wager
Philosopher Blaise Pascal came up with three arguments, not for the existence of
God, but for trying to talk yourself into believing there is a god, and that God
behaves as described in the Christian Bible. The concern is not for truth, but
for prudential practical benefit, basically that conning yourself is your best
bet. These arguments are, according to InfidelGuy.com,
the most commonly used by Christians debating with atheists. They are known
collectively as Pascal's
Wager. The argument is essentially this:
-
If you don't believe in God and you are wrong, after you die, you
are in deep trouble.
-
If you believe in God and you are wrong, nothing too terrible will
happen, other than the consequences of silly superstitious actions you may have
engaged in as a result, e.g. wasted time praying, or failing to take appropriate
action expecting God to bail you out.
-
If you don't believe in God and you are right nothing special
happens, other than living a fearless life.
-
If you believe in God and you are right, you hit the jackpot.
Of course you could construct a similar argument for believing in God as
described in most of the religions in this
list. Because there are so many, your odds of picking the right one, if any
such thing exists, are quite remote.
Bedford's Wager
The Riddle of Epicurus
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
My friend Darwin Bedford, the atheist messiah, at atheists.net
looks at it this way:
-
If you don't believe in God and you are wrong, after you die, so
long as you have lead a moral life you should have nothing to fear. A
compassionate god would not punish you for guessing which religion had an
exclusive handle on the truth.
-
If you believe in God and you are wrong, you will have done
foolish things such as wasting time praying when you should have taken effective
action. You will have lived your life as if it did not matter because you
erroneously thought it was merely a trial, preparatory to your real life after
death. You would have lived an overly safe conventional life, keeping your nose
clean and avoiding all adventure. You would have let evil thrive, because you
felt dealing with that was God's responsibility, not yours. You would have done
irrational things just because some hoary old book tricked you into it, like
mistreating blacks or gays. You would have wasted much of your life in fear of
the imaginary divine meat axe.
-
If you don't believe in God and you are right, you live a zestful
life. Every second counts. It is all you have got. You don't fritter your time
in ritualistic activities. You take responsibility for the planet. You make a
difference. You made your decisions rationally, not based on fear of some
lunatic bogeyman in the sky. You behave well not because you fear punishment,
but because you know that such behaviour is globally and locally optimal, good
for everyone and also for you. You are a blessing to the planet.
-
If you believe in God and you are right, you are more likely than
not to be an insufferably smug hypocrite, looking down your nose at others and
judging incessantly just as Jesus told you not to do. God judges your actions,
not your beliefs. In Luke 13:25, Jesus warned
you that mere praying would not get you into heaven; only good deeds would. You
get punished doubly since you ought to have known better.
Suicide
A religion is supposed to help you when things get really awful. A Christian
calls out to God and of course nothing happens. He feels even more abandoned. An
atheist does not bother. He has the possible out of suicide should things get
really really bad. He still has to balance the benefit of ending his personal
torment with increasing the pain of others. Normally people choose to stay alive
no matter how bad things are simply because life has a way of improving all by
itself. The suicide option is closed to the Christian. The Christian is trapped
by the threat of even worse eternal torment if he tries that escape. For the
atheist, at least knowing the option is there is a great comfort. There is a
limit to how much the atheist must endure. Even if Christians meddle and make
the suicide impossible, suffering is still limited in time. How do Christians
bear existence without that escape clause?
Links